Menu

Featured Cases

About the investigation

If you were covered by your employer’s health insurance plan, you may have overpaid for insurance premiums or out-of-pocket expenses related to specialty care procedures.

We are investigating whether health insurance companies may have violated the law by failing to obtain the most cost-effective healthcare options for you and other employees.

If you are a current or former employee of one the following companies, we’d like to speak to you:

  • Amazon
  • Berkshire Hathaway
  • Concentrix
  • Costco
  • FedEx
  • Home Depot
  • Kroger
  • Lowe’s
  • Marriott
  • Publix
  • Saratoga Investment Corp.
  • Starbucks
  • Target
  • UPS
  • Walmart

If your company is not on this list but has a self-funded health insurance program, we’d also like to speak with you.

What’s the issue?

We’re investigating whether health insurance companies are failing to act in your best interests, leading to unnecessarily high healthcare costs.

How can you get involved?

If you’re interested in learning more about our investigation to hold health insurance companies accountable for excess charges, we want to hear from you. Please fill out our form.

Our free case review form only takes 1–2 minutes to complete.

Free Case Review Form Below
Free Case Review Form Below

Overview

Walmart recently adjusted certain Spark drivers’ earnings through tip adjustments, raising concerns that drivers were not paid correctly. California Spark drivers are also receiving notices that they’re eligible for a healthcare subsidy under Proposition 22 that they did not receive. Walmart is belatedly requiring drivers to submit proof of health insurance to receive a healthcare subsidy that may already be guaranteed to them under the law.

Zimmerman Reed stands up for the rights of Spark and other gig drivers who have been wrongfully compensated. We have already helped thousands of gig workers recover the compensation they deserve.

If you are a Spark driver who recently received a tip adjustment or notice about a healthcare subsidy from Walmart, you may be entitled to receive additional compensation. Fill out the free case review form below to see if you qualify.

Proven Track Record

Zimmerman Reed has helped gig drivers before and, at no cost, can help you determine if you have a claim.

We’ve Helped Gig Drivers Pursue Arbitration.

At Zimmerman Reed, we have experience representing thousands of gig drivers through the arbitration process.

Ready for Some Answers?

When you work with Zimmerman Reed, we’ll provide a free, confidential case review. Employers can’t retaliate against you for speaking with a lawyer or for trying to protect your legal rights. There is no commitment or cost for the case review. Then, if we agree to work together on your case and we recover money for you, we’ll be paid a percentage of the total amount you receive.

If you have any questions, just fill out the contact form and one of our experienced attorneys will be in touch with you shortly.

Free Case Review Form Below
Free Case Review Form Below

What's this About?

If you or a loved one has been exposed to Paraquat and are suffering from Parkinson’s disease, we would like to speak to you.

Research has linked Paraquat to an increased risk of Parkinson’s disease, a serious brain disorder that leads to shaking, stiffness, and can cause difficulty with coordination, balance, and walking.

Fill out a free case review form to reach out to us.

What is Paraquat?

Paraquat is one of the most popular chemical herbicides used to control overgrown vegetation and weeds. Chemical herbicides are more commonly referred to as “weed killers.” While Paraquat is widely used in the US, it is reportedly banned in 32 countries because of its high toxicity. Herbicide products that contain Paraquat include Gramoxone, Firestorm, Helmquat, and Parazone.

Is Paraquat Toxic?

Paraquat is known to be an effective weed killer, but it is also a toxic chemical with serious health risks. Even a small amount ingested or inhaled may be fatal. In 2017, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) determined certain risk measures were necessary for pesticide products containing Paraquat to meet the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), including:

  • Label changes emphasizing Paraquat toxicity and supplemental warning materials
  • Targeted training materials for Paraquat users
  • Closed-system packaging for all non-bulk (less than 120 gallon) end use product containers of Paraquat
  • Restricting the use of all Paraquat products to certified applicators only

Does Paraquat cause Parkinson’s Disease?

Paraquat lawsuits allege that Paraquat can interfere with dopaminergic neurons in the brain by creating oxidative stress. Scientists have generally concluded that oxidative stress is a major risk factor in the cause of Parkinson’s disease. Multiple epidemiological studies have found that occupational exposure to Paraquat, like the type of exposure a farmer using Paraquat would expect, more than doubles the risk of developing Parkinson’s disease.

How Zimmerman Reed can Help

Zimmerman Reed represents individuals bringing claims against the manufacturers of Paraquat.  If you have been diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease and have a history of Paraquat exposure you may be entitled to compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

For more information about Parkinson’s disease, visit the Parkinson’s Foundation page.

 

Free Case Review Form Below
Free Case Review Form Below

What's the Issue?

Lyft’s Women+ Connect program receives praise for prioritizing rider comfort and choice by allowing women and nonbinary users to request same-gender ride matches.

However, Lyft does not provide LGBTQ+ users with a similar option despite an epidemic of harassment and discrimination against the LGBTQ+ community. This may violate California’s anti-discrimination law. If proven, violations of California’s law carry a statutory damages award of $4,000.

Why Might this be Discriminatory?

  1. LGBTQ+ Safety:
    Statistics demonstrate that the LGBTQ+ community faces significantly higher rates of violence, discrimination, and harassment nationally, yet Lyft does not provide LGBTQ+ users with an equivalent LGBTQ+ ride-matching option.
  2. Stereotyping Gay Men:
    By excluding gay men, Lyft may reinforce harmful stereotypes and ignore the fact that gay men are not statistically more likely to sexually assault or harass women.
  3. Inclusion Doesn’t Require Exclusion:

Lyft could provide the Women Connect+ option and provide similar options for LGBTQ+ and other users at the same time. Supporting one group doesn’t have to come at the expense of another.

Rideshare companies should prioritize safe, comfortable, and inclusive rides—for everyone.

What Does This Mean for You?

Submit a free case review form below and in a few minutes see if you qualify to file a claim for compensation against Lyft through private arbitration.

What Could I Get?

We cannot guarantee any specific outcome. California’s civil rights law states that proven violations carry a statutory damages award of $4,000. However, it is possible you may receive nothing or substantially less than the maximum amount.

What Fees do We Charge?

If you choose to pursue a claim, you will not be responsible for any fees or costs unless we obtain compensation for you. You will sign an agreement for Zimmerman Reed to represent you, and we only get paid if you do. If Zimmerman Reed is not successful in obtaining monetary compensation, you will owe us nothing. The firm will also advance the costs to submit and resolve your claim.

If your case settles or an arbitrator awards you compensation, our firm will receive a contingency fee from a portion of your settlement or compensation award. The choice to accept a monetary settlement is yours.

What am I Signing up for by Filling out the Form?

You are signing up to submit your compensation claim through arbitration. Arbitration is a private dispute resolution process outside of court, which means we will not be filing a traditional lawsuit. An arbitration company may appoint an arbitrator to rule on whether you are entitled to compensation for your claim. Our law firm has extensive experience handling arbitration cases, and the attorneys at Zimmerman Reed will handle the arbitration process on your behalf. We anticipate representing many people with similar claims at the same time.

What Happens Next?

By signing up you are joining others like you with similar claims who are represented by Zimmerman Reed. You will receive regular updates with developments as your claim progresses. If we need additional information for your claim, we will reach out to you.

I Have Questions. How Do I Contact You?

If you have questions, please use our contact form to get in touch.

Free Case Review Form Below
Free Case Review Form Below

Amazon Flex drivers are challenging Amazon

Amazon Flex Drivers are claiming that Amazon led them to believe that they would be truly independent workers – not subject to the direction and control of the company.

However, Amazon Flex Drivers are required to follow all the rules and are treated in virtually every respect as employees – except they don’t get benefits like overtime, sick days, health insurance, and reimbursement for expenses.

Zimmerman Reed stands up for the rights of gig drivers who were wrongfully misclassified as independent contractors and has already helped thousands of gig workers receive compensation they deserve.

Ready for your no obligation, free, and confidential case review? Fill out the free case review form below.

Proven Track Record

Zimmerman Reed has helped gig drivers before and, at no cost, can help you determine if you have a claim for reimbursements of business expenses (such as insurance, gas, and maintenance costs of your vehicle), improper wage deductions, and damages as a result of misrepresentation and unfair business practices.

Why do employers misclassify workers as “independent contractors”?

Independent contractor misclassification is widespread and it’s illegal. Employers will frequently misclassify workers as “independent contractors” to avoid paying certain expenses, including insurance and worker compensation coverage, and certain employer taxes. Drivers allege that the employer requires them to pay for their own expenses. But at all times, the employer had absolute control over the fares and fees charged and could terminate a driver without notice.

We’ve helped rideshare drivers hold their employers accountable in court.

At Zimmerman Reed, we have helped rideshare drivers before. We have represented thousands of Uber and Lyft drivers in individual arbitrations alleging the same misclassification violations. Drivers will have to bring their claims through individual arbitration as well.

Ready for some answers?

When you work with Zimmerman Reed, we’ll provide a free, confidential case review. Employers can’t retaliate against you for speaking with a lawyer or for trying to protect your legal rights. There is no commitment or cost for the case review. Then, if we agree to work together on your case and we recover money for you, we’ll be paid a percentage of the total amount you receive.

If you have any questions, fill out the contact form, and one of our experienced attorneys will be in touch with you shortly.

Free Case Review Form Below
Free Case Review Form Below

Gig workers are challenging employers

Gig drivers are claiming the employers led them to believe that they would be truly independent workers – not subject to the direction and control of the company.

Drivers are required to follow all the rules and are treated virtually in every respect as employees – except they don’t get any of the benefits like overtime, sick days, health insurance, and reimbursement for expenses.

We will stand up for the rights of drivers who were wrongfully misclassified as independent contractors and help you receive the compensation you deserve.

You’re Not The Only One

We have helped drivers before, and, at no cost, can help you determine if you have a claim for reimbursements of business expenses (such as insurance, gas, and maintenance costs of your vehicle), improper wage deductions, and damages as a result of misrepresentation and unfair business practices.

Why do employers misclassify workers as “independent contractors”?

Independent contractor misclassification is wide-spread and it’s illegal. Employers will frequently misclassify workers as “independent contractors” to avoid paying certain expenses, including insurance and worker compensation coverage, and certain employer taxes. Drivers allege that the employer requires them to pay for their own expenses. But at all times, the employer had absolute control over the fares and fees charged and could terminate a driver without notice.

We’ve helped rideshare drivers hold their employers accountable in court.

At Zimmerman Reed, we have helped rideshare drivers before. We represented hundreds of Uber drivers in individual arbitrations alleging the same misclassification violations. Drivers will have to bring their claims through individual arbitration as well.

Ready for some answers?

When you work with Zimmerman Reed, we’ll provide a free, confidential, case review.

Employers can’t retaliate against you for speaking with a lawyer or for trying to protect your legal rights. There is no commitment or cost for the case review. Then, if we agree to work together on your case and we recover money for you, we’ll be paid a percentage of the total amount you receive.

If you have any questions, fill out the contact form, and one of our experienced attorneys will be in touch with you shortly.

Free Case Review Form Below
Free Case Review Form Below

We never forget
who we’re fighting for.

logo-yellow
Follow Us

© 2025 Zimmerman Reed LLP. All Rights Reserved. Attorney Advertising. Prior Results Do Not Guarantee A Similar Outcome.
CONTACT US | LEGAL NOTICE